1031 Exchange · September 25, 2026 · Steven Owen
Boot and debt replacement: why “I reinvested everything” still triggers tax
To defer all of your gain, the replacement property has to be worth at least as much as what you sold and carry at least as much debt. Most owners understand the first half. The second half is where exchanges quietly generate tax bills: if you sold a property with a $1,000,000 loan and bought one with a $700,000 loan, the $300,000 of debt you shed is mortgage boot and it is taxable — even though no cash ever reached your hands, and even if you spent every dollar of proceeds on the purchase. Boot does not kill the exchange. It just carves a taxable slice out of it, and it tends to be discovered in April rather than at closing.
Two kinds of boot
Cash boot is net cash or other non-like-kind property you receive. The obvious version is proceeds you deliberately pull out of the closing. The less obvious versions are the ones that catch people: exchange funds used to pay costs that are not legitimate transaction expenses, a seller credit structured the wrong way, or prorated items such as security deposits and rent that get handled as cash to you rather than as adjustments on the replacement side.
Mortgage boot, also called debt relief, is the net reduction in liabilities from the relinquished property to the replacement property. You are relieved of a mortgage when you sell; if you do not take on at least as much debt on the replacement, the difference is treated as value you received.
The logic is consistent once you see it: an exchange defers gain only to the extent you stay fully invested. Cash out and debt shed are both ways of getting value out of the deal, so the code treats them the same way.
The arithmetic
Take an owner selling a Central Texas retail building:
| Relinquished | Replacement A | Replacement B | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purchase / sale price | $3,000,000 | $3,000,000 | $2,600,000 |
| Debt | $1,800,000 | $1,800,000 | $1,300,000 |
| Equity reinvested | $1,200,000 | $1,200,000 | $1,200,000 |
| Cash boot | — | $0 | $0 |
| Mortgage boot | — | $0 | $500,000 |
| Result | — | Full deferral | $500,000 recognized |
In scenario B the owner reinvested every dollar of equity and still recognized half a million dollars of gain, because they bought a cheaper building with a smaller loan. There is no cash sitting anywhere to pay the resulting tax. That is the whole problem with mortgage boot: it produces a tax liability and no liquidity to meet it.
The netting rules, including the one that is asymmetric
Cash and debt offset each other, but not in every direction. The rules that matter in practice:
| You do this | Does it offset cash boot received? | Does it offset mortgage boot received? |
|---|---|---|
| Add cash out of pocket to the replacement purchase | Yes | Yes |
| Take on more debt on the replacement property | No | Yes |
Read the bottom-left cell twice, because it is the one that costs money. Borrowing more does not cure cash you already took out. An owner who pulls $200,000 at the sale closing and then, on advice that sounds sensible, borrows an extra $200,000 on the replacement property has not fixed anything — the $200,000 of cash boot is still taxable, and they now carry more debt. The only cure for cash boot is not taking the cash.
Cash added, by contrast, is a universal solvent. The owner in scenario B above who writes a $500,000 check into the replacement closing eliminates the mortgage boot entirely.
Deliberate boot is a strategy; accidental boot is a surprise
Nothing here says you must achieve total deferral. Boot is taxable only up to your realized gain, and everything above that keeps deferring, so a partial exchange is a legitimate and common choice. An owner who needs liquidity — to pay down other debt, to fund a capital reserve, to take chips off the table after a long hold — can take it as boot, pay tax on that piece, and defer the rest. Done knowingly, with the tax modeled in advance, that is just financing.
The failure mode is arriving at it by accident: trading down in price because nothing else penciled inside the 45-day window, or replacing an amortized loan with a smaller one because the new asset would not support the same leverage at today’s rates. Both are common right now, and both show up as boot.
Where mortgage boot actually comes from in this market
Three recurring sources in Central Texas exchanges:
Trading down under time pressure. The 45-day clock pushes owners toward whatever is available rather than whatever is equivalent. A smaller replacement means less debt. The answer is to start the replacement search before the disposition, not after — see finding replacement property in 45 days.
Debt capacity that shrank. A property bought years ago at a low rate may have carried 65% leverage; the same debt service coverage at today’s rates might only support 55% on the replacement. Same equity, less debt, mortgage boot. Model the replacement loan early — by day 90 at the latest — not at the end.
All-cash replacement. Owners who sell a leveraged property and buy an unleveraged one, often deliberately to eliminate debt, create mortgage boot equal to the entire loan they paid off. This is sometimes the right life decision and almost always a taxable one. Know the number before you commit.
Practical guardrails
Give your qualified intermediary and CPA the closing statement from the relinquished sale and a draft settlement statement for the replacement before the replacement closes, not after. Ask one question explicitly: what is my net boot on this structure, and what is the tax on it? If the answer is a number you do not like, the levers are to add cash, increase the replacement loan (for mortgage boot only), or buy more property. All three have to happen before closing; none can be fixed afterward.
And watch the closing statement itself. Using exchange funds to pay non-transaction items — prepaid insurance, loan reserve escrows, a repair credit handled as cash — can create boot out of what looks like ordinary deal plumbing. Legitimate transaction costs such as brokerage commissions, title fees and recording charges generally can be paid from exchange proceeds; your intermediary will tell you which line items are which.
How SCORE helps
Steven Owen is an Austin commercial real estate Agent who underwrites the replacement side against the debt you are giving up, not just the price you are giving up. SCORE models value and debt replacement together before you go under contract, sizes the replacement loan early enough to matter, and works with your qualified intermediary and CPA so boot is a decision rather than a discovery. See 1031 exchange services and buyer representation.
Know your boot before you close, not in April.
Send us the relinquished property’s price and loan balance. We’ll show you what the replacement has to look like — in both value and debt — to defer everything.
Talk to Steven 1031 servicesThis article is general information for commercial real estate owners and investors, not tax or legal advice. Section 1031 is federal tax law and its application depends on facts specific to you and your property. Before starting an exchange, engage a qualified intermediary and confirm treatment with your CPA or tax counsel — SCORE Property Group and Steven Owen are real estate professionals, not tax advisors, and do not act as a qualified intermediary. Authorities referenced: Internal Revenue Code §1031 as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (real property only, effective 2018) and left unchanged by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed July 4, 2025; Treas. Reg. §1.1031(k)-1; Rev. Proc. 2000-37; Rev. Rul. 2004-86; IRS Form 8824. Verified as of September 25, 2026. Related: How a 1031 exchange works in Texas · The 45-day and 180-day deadlines · DSTs and NNN as replacement property · Finding replacement property in 45 days.

