Development · September 1, 2026 · Steven Owen
Data center water, cooling, and permitting in Texas
After power, the two things that decide a data center site are water and permission — how the campus is cooled, and whether the community will let it be built. On water, the range is enormous and driven almost entirely by cooling design: a hyperscale facility on conventional evaporative cooling can use 1 to 5 million gallons a day, while closed-loop and air-cooled designs cut that to a small fraction — sometimes near zero. On permission, Texas localities have weighed 100-plus data center ordinances since mid-2025, and in August 2026 the state ordered a grid-connection audit that slowed new projects. Both belong in a site’s diligence from day one.
How much water a data center really uses
The cooling system is the single biggest driver of water demand, and the numbers vary by orders of magnitude:
- Evaporative cooling — the conventional approach — can consume on the order of millions of gallons per year for each megawatt of IT load; a full-scale campus can reach 1–5 million gallons per day.
- Closed-loop cooling recirculates water in a sealed system. One Wisconsin campus reported peak use near 22,000 gallons per day, versus roughly 5 million for a similar-scale evaporative campus.
- Direct-to-chip and air cooling — newer designs circulate liquid straight to the chip in a sealed loop, using essentially zero water for cooling. New builds are migrating fast in this direction.
The practical upshot: a modern campus can be far less water-intensive than the headlines suggest — but the design has to be known, because it changes the site’s water requirement completely.
Water in Texas: rights, districts, and sourcing
Even a water-efficient campus needs a sourcing plan, and in Texas that runs through several channels: a public water utility (and its CCN service area), a groundwater conservation district that regulates well production, and surface- or ground-water rights. In the Hill Country, add Edwards Aquifer rules and impervious-cover limits. Developers now resolve water strategy early in site selection rather than treating it as a downstream engineering problem — and a landowner who understands their site’s water position negotiates from a stronger place. This is part of the broader site-selection screen.
Permitting: the local fight is real
Water and power get a project considered; local approval gets it built. Since mid-2025, Texas localities have taken up more than 100 data center ordinances, in three broad flavors:
- Moratoriums — temporary pauses on new projects (for example, a county-level pause on new AI data center development).
- Zoning and buffer frameworks — permitting requirements and setbacks, such as a 300-foot buffer from residential areas.
- Disapproval resolutions — formal statements of opposition that signal a hard permitting road.
Community concerns cluster around noise, light, water use, and property values, and organized opposition regularly turns out at planning and zoning meetings. The legal picture is unsettled: some moratoriums have been challenged, and at least one county rescinded its pause after a lawsuit. Layered on top, the state ordered a comprehensive audit of grid-connecting data centers in August 2026, effectively slowing new approvals pending review. For a landowner, the jurisdiction your land sits in — and its posture toward data centers — now materially affects value and timeline.
What to check before you count on a data center outcome
- Cooling assumption. Air/closed-loop vs. evaporative changes the water requirement by orders of magnitude — and the permitting story with it.
- Water sourcing. Utility CCN, groundwater district rules, and any aquifer or impervious-cover limits on your tract.
- Local posture. Any moratorium, buffer ordinance, or zoning framework in your city or county — and where it stands legally.
- Jurisdiction. City limits vs. ETJ vs. unincorporated county changes who reviews the project and how.
- Wastewater and stormwater. Discharge, detention, and TCEQ requirements that add cost and time.
How SCORE works the water-and-permitting question
Steven Owen — an engineer with an NYU Stern finance MBA — screens a tract for its water position and permitting exposure alongside power, so you know before you go to market whether a data center outcome is realistic and what could slow it. SCORE maps sourcing, jurisdiction, and local ordinance risk, then takes well-positioned sites to active developers through a direct buyer network. Pair this with powered land & ERCOT and how to sell to a data center developer, and see our Texas focus.
Weighing a data center use for your land?
Tell us where it is. We’ll read the water, jurisdiction, and permitting picture with the power position — and tell you whether it’s realistic, and what it’s worth.
Assess my land Talk to StevenFigures are directional and dated 2026 (industry water/cooling reporting, state and local policy trackers, news coverage of Texas ordinances and the 2026 state audit). This is general information, not investment, engineering, or legal advice; water sourcing, cooling design, and permitting are site-specific — confirm with civil/water engineering, the relevant districts, and counsel. Related: site selection criteria · powered land & ERCOT · selling land to a developer.

